# 早餐小蛋糕简单测评 # This time, the main thing is to open a small assessment to make a record for myself. The products are all one-maifan because the number in a pack is not bad, so I thought about hoarding some to eat (lazy). When I was just tagging, I found out that there is something I haven't eaten before. I will update it next time. There seem to be quite a few good brands of bread, so if you remember, I will write a review next time. Vita is mainly used for comparison. Let's talk about the number first. A little square and cheese are a box of 16, lava is a box of 6. Although, I like the large number of these, but the carton for each serving makes me feel a little unenvironmental. It would be better if there were more environmentally friendly packaging. (but I love individual packaging, just don't like cartons) I don't remember the price, but you can refer to the current price. single volume. As you can see in the picture, the length and width are actually a bit square and similar to the magma, but there are holes in the middle of the magma. Then the cheese is basically half the length. Then the cheese is the same height as a little square, but the lava is shorter (it is visible to the naked eye) Volume: a little square > cheese = magma. Taste. A little square is the traditional Qi Fang taste. To make an analogy, it is similar to Garton's chiffon cake, but the sweetness and taste are different. There is a certain degree of humidity. Cheese is more like a steamed cheesecake. It is a little denser than a little square. If you don't eat it carefully, you can't really eat it. There is a certain degree of humidity. The taste of magma is relatively rough...but it is compared with the previous two. The taste of the magma is more like a sponge cake. It is good to eat alone, but it will feel a bit thick in horizontal comparison. But I would think it should be the pot of sweetness and moistness. The magma is a little bit drier than the first two. It is also possible that there is more sugar in the baking, which causes the internal moisture loss of the cake body to be too high. However, if you eat magma alone, it is estimated that there is not much taste defect. At least a lot better than some of the brands I bought. Sweetness and richness. The biggest difference between a little Fang and Garton is the taste (and of course the volume). A little square, very light, light. It's not completely unsweetened, but the sweetness is basically if you eat some sweet things at random and then come and eat this, you can't taste the sweetness at all, it's really like chewing on a sponge (hey). But if you just want to eat less sugar, this is fine. I basically eat less sugar chrysanthemum tea + a little square is not bad, a little square can still taste sweet. But if there are other flavors, it really doesn't exist. The cake is fragrant, but it only has a little sweetness, and there is no other flavor. Overall it's quite tasty. Cheese should be the most finished of the three. The sweetness is moderate. The moderate here means that the cake is basically the same as the cake bought outside. It is much sweeter than a little square, but much lighter than the magma. Then with the taste of cheesecake, it is more rich in taste. If it is not for breakfast but the most greedy snack, it is actually quite suitable. Lava is sweet and sweet. I feel that the style of lava walking is extremely sweet, that is, there is a feeling of eating lava ice cream. Another analogy may be eating macarons. If it was Ant-Man, I would probably love this. Basically, eat it with chrysanthemum tea with less sugar. As soon as I drink chrysanthemum tea after eating the magma, it becomes sugar-free. But apart from the syrupy taste, I can't really taste anything else. In general, it is Quantity: A bit square -16, cheese -16, lava -6. Volume: a little square > cheese = magma. Taste: Softness: a little square = cheese > lava. Density: cheese > a little square > magma. Moisture: A bit square = cheese > lava. Sweetness: lava > cheese > a little square. Abundance: Cheese > Lava > A bit square. Personal preference: one Vita chrysanthemum tea for breakfast with less sugar + 2 little squares + cheese. Lava is suitable for making a cup of tea with a stronger taste (similar to black tea or green tea with a bit of bitterness) to eat together.
translate Show Original
# 早餐小蛋糕简单测评 # 这回主要就是开个小测评顺手给自己做一下记录。产品全是一麦番的因为一包里面个数还不错，就想着囤个吃的（懒）。 刚刚打tag的时候发现居然出了个没吃过的，下回有缘更新。面包好像也有不少牌子不错，下回如果还记得就去写个测评。 维他主要就是拿来做对比。 先说一下一份的个数。 有点方和芝士都是一盒16个，岩浆则是一盒6个。 虽然吧，我喜欢这种个数多的，但每份都是纸盒让我觉得有点不环保，要是有更加环保一点的包装就好了。（但我爱独立包装，只是不喜欢纸盒） 价格不太记得了，大家参考时价就好。 单个体积。 图片那里就可以看到，长和宽其实有点方和岩浆差不多，但岩浆中间有洞。然后芝士基本上长度短了一半。然后芝士和有点方高度一样，但岩浆矮了一些（是肉眼可见的矮） 体积：有点方＞芝士=岩浆。 口感。 有点方就是传统的戚方口感。要类比的话就是和嘉顿的雪芳蛋糕很像，但甜度和味道不一样。有一定的湿润度。 芝士就是比较像蒸出来的芝士蛋糕的口感，比有点方更加绵密一点点，不仔细吃其实吃不太出来。有一定的湿润度。 岩浆的口感比较粗糙……不过是和前面两个做对比。岩浆的口感更像是海绵蛋糕，单吃挺不错，但横向对比就会觉得有点粗。不过我会觉得应该是甜度和湿润度的锅。岩浆比前两个更干一点点，也有可能是烘培中糖比较多造成糕体内部水分流失过高。不过单吃岩浆的话估计是没有太大口感上的缺陷的。起码比我买的某些牌子好很多了。 甜度和丰富度。 有点方和嘉顿最大的不同估计就在口味了（当然还有体积）。有点方很淡淡淡淡淡淡。就也不是完全不甜，但这甜度基本上你随口吃个别的甜的东西然后过来啃这个你就完全吃不出甜味了，真的就和啃海绵一样（喂）。但如果你就是要少糖的吃这个挺好，我基本上少糖菊花茶+有点方吃着还不错，有点方还是能吃出甜味的。但如果说其他味道，那就真的没有了，蛋糕是香的，但也就只有加了那一丁点的甜味，没有其他任何的味道了。总的来说挺耐吃的。 芝士应该算是三者中成品度最高的了。甜度适中，这里的适中指的就是和外面买的蛋糕基本上甜度差不多，和有点方比甜很多，但比岩浆淡很多。然后带着芝士蛋糕的味道，算是味道比较丰富的。如果不是当早餐而是当最馋的小零食，其实挺适合的。 岩浆就是甜甜甜甜甜。感觉岩浆走的风格就是甜到极致，就是有种吃岩浆冰淇淋的感觉，另一种类比可能就是吃马卡龙。如果是蚂蚁人估计就很爱这种。基本的和菊花茶少糖一起吃，我啃完岩浆一喝菊花茶就变成无糖的感觉了。不过除了糖浆味也吃不太出别的来了。 总的来说，就是 个数：有点方-16，芝士-16，岩浆-6。 体积：有点方＞芝士=岩浆。 口感：柔软度：有点方=芝士＞岩浆。 密实度：芝士＞有点方＞岩浆。 湿润度：有点方=芝士＞岩浆。 甜度：岩浆＞芝士＞有点方。 丰富度：芝士＞岩浆＞有点方。 个人偏好：早餐一个维他菊花茶少糖+2个有点方+芝士。岩浆适合泡一杯茶味重一点的（类似红茶或者带点苦味的绿茶）一起吃。